Blog powered by Typepad

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Become a Fan

« Epistemology and Metaphysics | Main | Utilitarianism in the Big Blogs »

June 21, 2005


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Tabarrok also seems to think that evidence which is available to only certain people or only if interpreted in some unproveable way counts as evidence. Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that. Either something is objectively confirmable to all parties, or it isn't evidence. If I deeply hated someone and could call my beliefs evidence, then I could claim that it's rational to want to kill them because I have evidence (i.e. a deep belief) that they are a threat to the existence of the country. But unless I can produce some reason to justify my belief, no court in the world is going to, or should, count my convictions as "evidence" or my behavior as objectively rational.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)