But otherwise, this seems to me to be on the right track. Still, the raft? For Neurath, it was normally a ship; I'm actually demoting the theory in my blog title.
Become a Fan
« Masters in the Republic | Main | A guilty pleasure »
October 07, 2005
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452b54c69e200d83490273469e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why such a small vessel?:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Categories
- 20th century philosophy
- Academia
- Analytic vs. Continental
- Architecture
- Art
- Books
- Carnap
- Current Affairs
- Economics
- Epistemology
- Ethics
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Feminism
- History
- Humor
- Love Advice
- Metaphysics
- Nietzsche
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Plato
- Politics
- Positivist Revivalism
- Religion
- Science
- Science Fiction
- Your humble author
Neurath's rubber ring? Just keep pumping in more hot air de temps en temps?
I think of foundationalists as people who drown looking for a buoyancy aid whilst they would have lived if they just kept swimming.
Posted by: MikeS | October 08, 2005 at 04:30 PM