If I correctly understand Amanda's point, then it seems to me that Thomson's pro-choice arguments (violinists, people seeds, and such) should be more persuasive than Tooley's (the kittens). Does anybody have any thoughts on whether that's actually the case (or on whether I'm applying Amanda's theory correctly, for that matter)?
Become a Fan
« South Dakota and all that | Main | A stirring proclamation »
February 26, 2006
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452b54c69e200d8352787f753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on abortion:
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Categories
- 20th century philosophy
- Academia
- Analytic vs. Continental
- Architecture
- Art
- Books
- Carnap
- Current Affairs
- Economics
- Epistemology
- Ethics
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Feminism
- History
- Humor
- Love Advice
- Metaphysics
- Nietzsche
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Plato
- Politics
- Positivist Revivalism
- Religion
- Science
- Science Fiction
- Your humble author
Comments