PZ Myers stands up for philosophers!

Critics of intelligent design sometimes suggest that it ought to be discussed in philosophy classes rather than biology classes. A recent post at Pharyngula recognizes that intelligent design's total lack of intellectual content makes it of little more interest to philosophers than to biologists; it's so nice to see someone who isn't a philosopher recognize this point.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Comments

[Jim Farmelant]

There is no reason why philosophers should be any more interested in Intelligent Design than biologists. One can characterize Intelligent Design with the same words that physicist Paul Dirac once used to characterize a vague scientific paper, "It is no even wrong."