Blog powered by Typepad

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Become a Fan

« Influences | Main | PZ Myers stands up for philosophers! »

November 10, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jim Farmelant

One thing to keep in mind is to consider the differences in responses by the US to Iraq, which the US had alleged to have WMDs under Saddam Hussein, versus the US response to North Korea which in fact did develop nuclear weapons. Iraq, the country which was alleged to have WMDs, but in fact didn't, was invaded by the US in 2003 and Saddam was overthrown. North Korea, on the other hand was never invaded. Eventually a settlement was negotiated in which the North Koreans eventually agreed to dismantle their nuclear weapons program in exchange for various guarantees from the US including promises not to topple their regime plus promises of economic assistance.

The take home lesson here seems obvious. If you are a small country concerned with maintaining a modicum of sovereignty in a world dominated by one big superpower, the way to go is rush and develop your own nuclear weapons, thereby allowing you to negotiate with the world's superpower from a position of relative strength.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)